Turner Prize winner – painting retrospective works of tedium.

Tomma Abts1

German-born artist Tomma Abts has become the first woman painter to win the controversial and ageist Turner Prize in its 22-year history.

The artist, who has lived in Britain for 12 years, beat video artist Phil Collins, poster artist Mark Titchner and sculptor Rebecca Warren.

The judges ( Nick Serota ) said the 38-year-old, who confines her paintings to an enthralling 19ins X 15ins trademark size, had produced “compelling images that reveal their complexity slowly over time”.

Artist Yoko Ono presented the £25,000 prize at London’s Tate Britain.

Turner portrait
J. M. W. Turner
( Self portrait, 1799 )

Mr Turner quite possibly turned in his grave at the floundering banality of works by the four shortlisted artists in this year’s ageist (under 50s only) Turner Prize. One of whom, Rebecca Warren, churns out sculpture such as this;
rebeccawarren_2

Read the way these sterile homogenized hulks of ugly are eulogized to high heaven and given artistic justification in a way that only a troupe of pseudo-intellectual self-important cosied-up art toffs could hyperbole.

The talking heads members of the Turner Prize 2006 jury.
( A guaranteed mutual schmooz club )
Lynn Barber, writer, The Observer
Margot Heller, Director, South London Gallery
Matthew Higgs, Director and Chief Curator, White Columns, New York
Andrew Renton, writer and Director of Curating, Goldsmiths College
Nicholas Serota, Director, Tate and Chairman of the Jury ( what the thin grey boss says, goes )

Rebecca Warren

For her exuberant sculptural installations as seen in her solo exhibitions at Matthew Marks Gallery, New York, and Galerie Daniel Buchholz, Cologne, and for her contribution to the Tate Triennial 2006. Her works combine a wide range of sources with a strong formal awareness, injecting conventional materials with a sensual physicality to create something wholly new. ”

“Strong formal awareness” – now what might that exactly mean? And since when was day center pottery class-pile or lumpen plasticine playschool-grotesque; “wholly new”?

All Serota’s pompous entrenched clique seem to do well is court media controversy via cheap tit n’ ass shock-shots such as Warren’s hideous spew, promoted to swell the Tate turnstile cashbox with the gullible public’s hard-earned.

Or, tipping an upstaging hat to the Stuckists, with the first female painter to have ever won, the abstract painter Tomma Abts was given the prize on the basis of works such as this. . .
tommaabts_mehm_s
Mehm, 2005

Quoting from the Tate website,
” . . .Through her intimate and compelling canvases, she builds on and enriches the language of abstract painting”

Compare that with this work by L. Moholy-Nagy, painted 78 years previously.
a19_crop
A19, 1927

It’s not easy to see what’s being “built on” and “enriched” in the abstract painting tradition here, except perhaps hype and imitation?

M.St.M

For art out of the sterile box however, there’s always;
London Dada Quickview Flikr Stream 2005 – present

17 thoughts on “Turner Prize winner – painting retrospective works of tedium.

  1. Hiya Bev, she is so sweet and reminds me of my grandaughter who has just started swimming leno.nsoAssther wonderful card with great colour choice.Thanks for the chance to win.Love Karen M xx

    Like

  2. ai eu adimiro muito esse beijo dar vontade da gente beijar alguem nesse momento dar vontade até comer a boca do menino ai gente adoogggoooo beijar de lingua

    Like

  3. Pingback: The Ageist Turner Prize | LONDON DADA

  4. Just for the record, here’s what I said about Abts’ abstracts:

    “Her work deserves a prize for vacuous drabness. It looks like doodles done by a lobotomised computer. Even Microsoft screensavers look attractive in comparison”

    Like

  5. Yes poor old Turner must be spinning at mega rpm.
    Disappointing and uninspiring was my reaction 😦
    You should enter next year but you would have to dumb your work down considerably 🙂
    Still £25k would buy a few bottle of good wine eh 😉

    Like

  6. I loved the (Rebecca Warren) sculptures on skateboards, how original.

    The most exciting short listed entry, in my opinion.

    Until judges of this power of 25,000 pounds giveaway, can reconginse more spritual art. Then todays artists are not going to climb out of the box. Our art world will continue to live in the past along side the greatmasters of begone years.

    Like

    • Those hideous Warren “casterplast” hulks on roller skates gave just about the best laugh I had all year – seriously.

      Spiritual art -you hit the nail OTH!. That’s exactly where NEW DADA want to go.
      So come with it R.Girl, let’s have some jpeg thing from you . . .

      Like

      • Oh Yah! The reaction the art creates within the eye and soul of the beholder.

        Hideous? oh yes -:)) but Thats where the beauty lies MstM within the humour; regardless of the creative media used.

        Don’t you think ?

        Like

      • We’re obviously seeing something ludicrous into these sculptures that was not intended by the artist. The wheels underneath are just so as the works can be moved around the gallery.

        Warren and the Tate want us to take this stuff seriously,almost worshipable, by covering it in pseudo-intellectual fawning and flowery artspeak.

        It’s about the only thing that Serota does well – guild the bullshit.

        Like

      • “We’re obviously seeing something ludicrous into these sculptures that was not intended by the artist. The wheels underneath are just so as the works can be moved around the gallery.”

        Yes I did now the reason for the wheels MstM!!! -;)neverless,

        Rebecca Warren: no doubt will not be amused of my eye view. -;) cos she so hell bound to work with the restrictive bounderies of the todays art world. Yes It was fun, certainly not serious and defintally most defintally not worshipable. who do they think they are??

        I wonder if the perspective changes when one eye see’s around the “bullshite” and another looks through it?

        Like

    • I think they’re perhaps covering themselves against the Stuckists’ growing support for their “bring back painting” campaign. Also, to give it to a woman painter for the first time in 20 years secures the PC side of things.

      The trouble with the Stuckists is that they don’t recognize art outside of oils on canvas.
      Stuck in the past, more like.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.